Version111 Research indicates that the characteristics we were born with have much more influence on our personality and development than experiences we have had in our life. Which do you think is the major influence?
------------Argumentation--------38+95+89+42=264 words in
------------Argumentation--------38+95+89+total-------------
Introduction ( 38words)
Human's endeavor in researching on factors affecting one's personality and
development has offered quite a amount of proofs. My position may provide you with a clear notion that nurture plays a far more important role in one's development.
Body 1 (95words)
Reportedly there was a maid, a countryside girl with only an educational background of primary school, working for an American professor who worked in Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. After two years of stay at the learned and exotic surroundings, amazingly this plain girl could speak fluent English and started to help the host to receive and send e-mails to his students. When the professor left for New York later, soon she sought a post at a multinational firm. This example clearly reveals a common truth: appropriate nurture can turn an average person to be competent. (topic sentence)
Body 2 (89words)
I will then go on to examine my position by offering other facts. It is well believed that
overseas graduates who once furthered their education in foreign universities are taking incredible places in China because these elites have a broader way of thinking and their bilingual and creative capabilities have proved themselves much better than domestic ones. In contrast, some people show their linguistic talent by precisely speaking a variety of dialects but still lead a poor life because no foreign language learning process has been conducted for them.
Conclusion ( 42words)
To sum up, the competence of a former maid and the qualities of overseas Chinese students already illustrate an undeniable fact: a right way of nurture can mould one to be outstanding whilst extraordinary nature without nurture is a waste of resource.
v111
Is it nature or nurture that plays a major role in the development of personality? What’s your opinion?
Nowhere in the world has the issue of children’s education been so much debated as in our society. Nowadays, many parents let their children attend all kinds of courses that will help children to get a better future; therefore, some people think that the postnatal nurture is more important than the congenital factors for personal growth and progress. The above point is certainly true; this essay will outline three reasons.
The main reason is that success of a child would not be separated from right teaching and personal effort. Currently, lots of famous scientists and politicians gain huge success in
the world, as they are long-term to hard work. Moreover, the main reason why plenty of developing countries drop behind is their poor education.
Another reason is that if people do not work hard but only depend on their high intellect, they will be far from successful. For instance, the little Bronte was quite clever during his childhood; he was particularly adept at writing. But he was so satisfied with his superior intellect that he did not study carefully. Finally, he became an idle person. However, his sisters became famous authors as a result of their hard study. They are Charlotte Bronte and Emily Bronte. Charlotte wrote “Jane Eyre “, “Wuthering Heights” was written by Emily.
Last but not the least reason is the advantages of natural factors that are more and more similar. Plenty of advanced technological products are invented and widely used. They can supply people’s gaps. In the past, the difference of mathematical ability was remarkable. With the invention of the calculator, people can hardly find out the difference.
In conclusion, scientific and proper teaching is the most significant factor for personal growth and development. If people are satisfied with their advantages, they will become the biggest failures.
因篇幅问题不能全部显示，请点此查看更多更全内容